Teens often get involved in different sorts of illicit activities thinking that they will get away with it. Among the most common breaches of law are underage drinking, vandalism, doing drugs, etc. At the same time, young people also commit more serious crimes, such as breaking into properties, car theft, manslaughter, or even rape. Although all kids are apt to bend the law, adolescents do it much more often. The reality is that teenagers in the USA often take part in different risky activities, which may have dire consequences taking a toll on the individual who committed it. Some people justify minors who commit these crimes since they are still children who are apt to make mistakes. However, we should not disregard the fact that most of these children are human beings who are able to think rationally and thus, undertake full responsibility for their actions. Accordingly, parents should not account for their kids' crimes.
Parents should not take criminal responsibility for the crimes of their children since any person of sound mind is able to think rationally and thus, understand that by committing a crime they do something wrong. Their parents have nothing to do with it unless they abet in these crimes or encourage their kids to commit them. Only then can parents be held criminally responsible for the crimes of their children. The main reason why people commit crimes is that they think that they can escape punishment. The same is true about teens who get involved in illicit activities: they do so hoping that they will get away with it. It cannot be set down to the person's upbringing, as it is only a matter of having sense between what is right and wrong. Even when the children have some mental problems, it is still cannot be considered a parent's fault.
If somebody's child commits a crime and has to take criminal responsibility for it, parents should not be held criminally responsible for the actions they did not commit. Some people cannot comprehend the link between the child's sense of what is right and wrong and their upbringing. However, when it comes to crimes, a child can still be tempted to steal somebody's possession even if their parents taught them not to steal. Thus, we cannot find faults with parents who have nothing to do with this crime but rather with the child who consciously committed a crime and thus, should be held criminally responsible for it.
For the exception of the case when parents abet their children in committing a crime, the adult should never take responsibility for the child’s actions. It often happens that when children get in trouble, all the blames are pinned on their parents since they did not raise them properly and did not instill respect for law. The problem the society faces now is that minors commit crimes and become adults without being held responsible for their misdeeds. But it should not go this way since it gives children confidence that even if they commit a crime, they are not going to face the consequences for what they did.
To sum it up, we all make mistakes, and sometimes we commit crimes while not being aware of it (a striking example is how people send their family members pain relievers, which can only be described as a felony). And when people engaged in illicit activities get caught, they get charged. This is also true for children, or more precisely, teens. They are perfectly aware of the fact that that they commit a crime and thus, their parents should not take responsibility for it unless their parents encouraged them to commit these actions. Accordingly, it makes sense for young people to take responsibility for their actions.
Reference: dissertation discussion writing services